Modèle de concours : CNC 2026 — Anglais (filière TSI) — Concours National Commun d'accès aux écoles d'ingénieurs
⬇️ Télécharger le PDF Adresse permanente : wadifa-info.com/fr/modele-concours/3951
En bref
Ce document est une ancienne épreuve écrite du concours de Accès aux écoles d'ingénieurs (CPGE) organisé par Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche Scientifique et de l'Innovation — Concours National Commun (2026), publiée sur Wadifa Info en consultation et téléchargement PDF gratuits.
- Organisme
- Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche Scientifique et de l'Innovation — Concours National Commun
- Grade
- Accès aux écoles d'ingénieurs (CPGE)
- Spécialité
- Anglais — filière TSI
- Année
- 2026
- Pages
- 4
- Langue des questions
- français
- Correction
- pas encore disponible
📝 Texte des questions (extrait automatiquement des pages scannées)
Ce texte est extrait automatiquement des images de l'épreuve et peut contenir des erreurs de lecture — les images ci-dessus font foi.
١ HRHA£ ١ المملكة المغربية 1 06 بع : ï teCell@t 1 SOOHEA ماللاتماه A ا ونظرة التعليم الماليى اخ حي | 0 ادف #له: À 2OIXHEH والبحث الطمر_والابتكان جه | ا Royaume du Maroc : 1 Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, 1 1 de la Recherche Scientifique et de l'Innovation D INSEA | CONCOURS NATIONAL COMMUN إٍْ d’Admission dans les Établissements de Formation d'Ingénieurs et إٍْ إٍْ Établissements Assimilés إٍْ Session 2026 ٍْ إٍْ Epreuve de : Anglais Filières : TSI Date : 14-05-2026 Durée 2 Heures de 17H00 à 19H00 TEST INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES Before answering the test questions, read the instructions carefully. 1. Make sure you have four printed pages. ù 2. The test is divided into three main sections: Critical Reading - Translation - Writing 3. If, during the test-taking process, a candidate identifies a point requiring clarification or a i potential error in the test questions, they should note it on their answer sheet and i 1 proceed with their composition, justifying his initiative. É ; 4. Make sure your handwriting is clear. lllegible handvwriting will affect the whole correction process and may even jeopardize your final score. E IMPORTANT .ٍ ï e You are not allowed to use any document, electronic device or communicate with anyone 1 during the testing session. Evidence of cheating (during the test administration or paper É correction) will automatically disqualify the candidate. ; e Submitting a blank answer booklet will automatically disqualify the candidate. wadifa-info.com نماذج المباريات من موقع وظيفة إنفو i SECTION 1: CRITICAL READING ! إٍُ Read the texts below and answer the questions that follow: Te a لاا # # CRE SN AR 1 The scientific method is routinely framed as a 16 or 17° Acknowledging this lineage does not diminish the i 1 century European invention (1)—a historically achievements of the European scientific revolution. 1 incomplete shorthand that overlooks the contributions Rather, recognizing Muslim scholars would clarify the ! 1 of Islamic scholars. When the scientific method is framed record and strengthen science education by showing i 1 as a Western possession, non Western trainees are more how methods evolve through translation, critique, and ! likely to be perceived as guests rather than as inheritors recombination across societies. Textbook authors and ; ; of a shared tradition. Devaluing non Westerners could curriculum committees should revise textbook and 1 contribute to policies that quietly legitimize excessive syllabus language to reflect the scientific method's : E gatekeeping. For example, US travel bans on Arab and cumulative, cross civilizational development (9, 10) and è 1 other Muslim majority countries have disrupted scientific should integrate a brief description of the history of : 1 mobility and participation (2), and in Canada, a 2024 cap scientific methods into research and mentorship : : reduced approved study permits for international training. Journals and publishers can reinforce this أ students by about 35% relative to 2023 (3, 4). Science historical accuracy by avoiding shorthand with : 1 educators and communicators should work to increase Eurocentric origins in educational content. Ensuringthat É the understanding, both within and outside of the an accurate history of science is taught and understood É scientific community, that science has a multicultural is foundational to trust in science, scientific literacy, and 1 history and that science today must foster a sense of inclusion in the scientific community. 1 1 1 1 : belonging for those of non Western backgrounds. Muhammad Shehryar Khan, M,K.(2026). Department of Mechanical : The core practices that are now associated with modern and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, AB, Canada. ; à science—systematic observation, experimental testing, REFERENCES AND NOTES - E ï quantitative analysis, and disciplined skepticism toward 1.G. S. Aikenhead, D. Elliott, Can. .ل Sci. Math. Technol, Educ. 10, 321 (2010) i authority—were explicitly articulated and practiced : nn le posisecondary enrolments and graduates, i É during the Islamic Golden Age, which lasted from the 8th 20223 0 Re 1 إٍ! to 14th centuries (5). Ibn al Haytham (6), for example, 4. اشم السلا Citizenship Canada, “Canada فا stabilize growth and 8 paired mathematical reasoning with controlled decrease number of new international student penmits issued to approximatelÿ | experimentation to overturn prevailing theories of vision a dut 1 and 308060 thät investigators must be guided by new-intemationalstudent-permits-issued-to-approximately-360000-for-2024.hunl. ! i demonstration rather than deference. Scholars such as al > جيرا te حم للا : ; Biruni (7) advanced careful measurement and attention 7.0. Sheynin, Arab. Sci. Philos, 2, 299 (1992) ا 8 testing treatments that anticipate key elements of Press, 2007) i ! controlled, reproducible evaluation. 10. À. Kabeer, J. W. Tsai, Nature 560, 29 (2018) The first person widely credited with developing a Aristotle provided another ingredient for the scientific 1 ا systematic scientific approach was Ibn al-Haytham (965- method, namely empiricism. He contributed to the أ 1040 AD). After years of studying light and vision, he development of empirical thinking by introducing à 1 demonstrated that light travels in straight lines. inductive and deductive reasoning, bringing science | É However, we should not consider the scientific method closer to observation-based inquiry. After Aristotle, : as a “fixed prescription” or a “recipe”. It is rather a significant developments were made during the Islamic 1 flexible, evolving process that relies on creativity and Golden Age. Muslim scientists used experimentation and 1 1 continuous improvement where all the steps and quantification—to—distinguish between competing É procedures are continuously evaluated through peer scientific theories, set within a generically empirical 1 review, allowing knowledge to be refined over time. orientation, as can be seen in the works of Jabir Ibn i Î In fact, the history of the scientific method is the history Hayyan (circa 721-815 AD) and al-Kindi (circa 801-873 i of science itself. Early philosophers/scientists used AD). However, it was Ibn al-Haytham who first ! various methods to validate their ideas, theories, developed proper experimental scientific methods by ! i observations, discoveries, and findings. Evidence of basic using experimentation and mathematics to obtain the ; i scientific practices can be found in ancient civilizations. results as seen in his magnum opus Kitab al:-Manazir | Forexample, an ancient Egyptian medical text, the Edwin (Book of Optics). He combined observations, empirical 1 Smith Papyrus (c. 1600 B.C.) mentions examination, work and rational arguments to support his intromission : diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. theory of vision, where rays oflightareemittedfromthe : 0 objects rather than the eyes. He used the same scientific i Liz. Eslidebemiarsemimicim-cmcmimcsescmcmemsetntmsmemesemswsmememamimimememmomemamememeememsmeomemamumenmemsmememememsmememememememenemememre J wadifa-info.com نماذج المباريات من موقع وظيفة إنفو ةد ا تدده نس ا ساد لني لنسيفان امسا امد م وار الا تاس ل تاد )اتات لجا ا approach to prove that the emission theory of vision as errors, including those from instruments and human ا 1 واس حي 17 i proposed by Ptolemy and Euclid (where the eyes emit factors. RE Le 1 ا . 8 1 : 1 rays of light) as well 25 the intromission theory of vision These contributions from these important historical : أ the foundation to the methodology برا proposed by Aristotie (where objects emit physical figures in science 5 | particles into the eyes) were both wrong. Ibn al used today in modern science. However, one must ; 1 Haytham 5 scientific method was similar to modern remember that science has its limitations, and thatthe : scientific method, and consisted of explicit statement of methodology applied in scientific endeavours may not i: أ i the problem, tiéd to observation and to proof by be perfect. What the scientificmethod doesistoprovide ]أ experiment; testing and/or criticism of a hypothesis a certain level of confidence that the knowledge 1 When scientific ; عاطقنا through experimentation; interpretation of deta and obtained is objective and ا عط صق formulation er using mathematics; and the knowledge is objective and credible, then it i publication offindings. regarded as a “tool” to seek the truth in understanding : î Al-Biruni (973-1048) expanded the application of the world that Allah has created. 1 ns É اح scientific method in various fields of science, such as ! mineralogy, mechanics, astronomy and geography. Al- : : : i 1 à 8 à 6 Adapted from: Shaikh Mohd Salleh, 5. M (2018, April 25( "1057 ! ! Biruni emphasised on the importance of repeating contributions to the scientific method”. Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia ! ! experiments in order to prevent systematic 200 random https://www.ikim.gov.my/en/muslims-contributions-to-the- 1 ا scientific-method/ 1 ل شا ال ——_— A 1 DISPLAYING COMPREHENSION ! : Answer the questions below using your own words. (Heavy reproduction of the text language will 1 .1 1 be penalized). (4 pts.) i 1 i 1. Both texts challenge the idea that the scientific method is purely a European invention. How do j the authors use historical examples to reshape this narrative? ; Why does the author emphasize repetition of experiments and acknowledgment of errors, and .2 1 what does this imply about the reliability of scientific conclusions? à Paraphrasing (1 pt.) 5 7 Paraphrase the following idea from the reading texts in your own words: : “The scientific method should not be seen as a rigid set of steps, but rather as a flexible and evolving 1 process that relies on creativity, testing, and continuous improvement. : Commentary (4 pts.) .3 | i Write a commentary on the following poster and highlights the importance of science. Do not exceed 100-word paragraph. (4 pts.) : ; إٍْ 0 EE ٍ كرا كه إن | ' ! م © CAN BE MITIGATED ل رهاب É VX KA AND PROGRISSINE 4 ال ج 1 RARE «D BOSSER نماذج المباريات من موقع وظيفة إنفو wadifa-info.com اا ل ااا ااانا اانا اا ناا ااا اا ااا ا لاا ل i ِ 1 SECTION 2: TRANSLATION | Theme: Translate the following passage from French into English. (3 pts.) : En nous référant à des observations telles que « la science moderne ne prétend pas aborder le sens à إٍْ i de la vie ; cela ne relève pas de son domaine. Dans le monde islamique, le sens est une composante i essentielle de la vie », devrions-nous pour autant ériger une frontière entre science musulmane et 1 science moderne ? Bien sûr que non. Toutes deux poursuivent la même mission : comprendre la : : E création. Par exemple, les docteurs Salam, Weinberg et Sheldon ont contribué à répondre à une Û même question concernant la création : comment l'électromagnétisme et l'interaction faible sont- É ! E ils des manifestations différentes d'une même force? i 56010036 1 Choose ONE of the writing assignments below: (8 pts.) ٍ Topic 1: Relying exclusively on the documents in the test paper, write a synthesis that reacts to the following question: ا “Ifthe scientific method is a shared and evolving human creation, can it ever truly be neutral or universally valid?” : إٍُ Document 1: the reading texts (pp. 1-2) — Document 2: the poster (p. 3) | — Document 3: the text to translate on Theme (p. 4) — Compulsory indications: E à — Write your synthesis in 200- 250 words. 5 Indicate the number of words between brackets at the end of your product ; — L (title included). Refer to the documents as (Doc1, Doc 2, Doc 3). — Topic 2: pers E “In the digital age, does Widespread social awareness serve as an effective catalyst for meaningful social action, or does it primarily foster "slacktivism"* as a state where awareness replaces tangible : 1 action? Discuss this issue in a structured argumentative essay, supporting your position with , relevant examples and well-developed reasoning.” i #Slacktivism refers to low-effort online actions, like liking, sharing, or signing digital petitions, taken i to support a cause. i ا 4 ْ أرجت جه جسم كك ل جا لاي وا موه بوه جات باج حو جر جا جد موا ا 2 نماذج المباريات من موقع وظيفة إنفو wadifa-info.com
Questions fréquentes sur ce sujet
Ce sujet est-il téléchargeable gratuitement ?
Le corrigé est-il inclus ?
Quel organisme et quel grade concerne ce sujet ?
De quelle session s'agit-il et dans quelle langue ?
Où trouver d'autres sujets du même concours ?
Vous préparez ce concours ?
Modèles similaires
Organisme : Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche Scientifique et de l'Innovation — Concours National Commun · 14/05/2026 — Copie issue de : archive de modèles de concours — document archivé tel que reçu ; l'avis officiel du concours fait foi.
}Citer cette page
Journaliste, blogueur, enseignant : copiez la référence ci-dessous et mettez un lien vers cette page.
Adresse permanente : https://www.wadifa-info.com/fr/modele-concours/3951/modele-de-concours-cnc-2026-anglais-filiere-tsi-concours-national-commun-d-acces-aux-eco
